Mining for Metals Requires a Long View


Reading time ( words)

Nolan Johnson talks with Shaun Dykes, a 50-year expert in the mining industry. Dykes gives a concise primer on mining development, and the amount of time and effort required to develop and supply the mineral resources we depend upon for the manufacture of printed circuit boards. There are many factors that play into when and where a mine is developed—and what can prevent a mine from ever producing minerals.

Nolan Johnson: Shaun, what is your specific role and your background?

Shaun Dykes: I’m the president and CEO at American CuMO Mining Corp., and an engineer and geologist by background. I’ve been in the business for almost 50 years. I’ve been all over the world, looking at and worked on deposits in different regimes, governments, and bureaucracies from Canada, U.S., and Australia. I spent time in Russia and South America as well.

Johnson: Minerals and their role in the supply chain for finished metals has a great impact on my readers. They rely on the copper, tin, lead, and all the metals that go onto those fiberglass boards. In addition, there’s solder and the minerals involved in those formulations. Copper, of course, plays a central role; that seems to be a metal at the core of the dynamics going on.

What are some of the global supply and demand trends in your industry and how might that be affecting us in electronics manufacturing?

Dykes: Metals, especially now with all the new technologies, are appearing everywhere—your circuitry, desalination plants, batteries, even your drinking water. Every single metal is in strong demand. The supply is getting shorter and shorter, and as mines become older, the grades are dropping and that reduces the amount of metal available. It now takes about five times longer to permit a mine than it used to because of the new regulations and rules you must go through.

Even then, some mines just can’t go into production because they’re either too costly or the opposition is too strong, and you can’t get the permits to proceed. Right now, the supply is far less than the demand. Of course, that demand is increasing on a steady basis, year in, year out. That’s why you’re seeing the increase in metal prices.

Johnson: It sounds to me like any sort of domestic mining is under even stricter regulation, even while the demand is going up.

Dykes: Definitely. What we go through in the mining industry—some of it’s good, while some is red tape and just absolute garbage. But other parts are good for the environment to make sure that the old days of mining, where you just rape and pillage with no care for what was going on, is long gone. Now, when we look at developing new mines, one of the first things we look at is the environment—rare and endangered species, trees, and more, before we even start spending the hundreds of millions of dollars it takes to develop a mine.

Johnson: Hundreds of millions of dollars to develop a mine? In our space, to build a computer chip factory, a semiconductor factory, is hundreds of millions of dollars and four or five years before it’s producing. Is it comparable with a mine? If you decide to go forward, how quickly can you get a mine up and running?

Dykes: Well, it depends. From first boots on the ground, you’ve got to drill it and explore; for the larger scale mines, like the ones that supply your metals, it’s averaging close to 20 years.

Johnson: Twenty years to get a mine started?

Dykes: From when you’ve discovered and outlined it, and let’s say you’ve got all your resources and a bankable feasibility study, it’s probably two to four years to construct it. Your construction costs can range from a couple hundred million dollars for the small mines up to several billion dollars for the large scale. A large-scale copper mine today will cost $2 billion to $3 billion, maybe even more. We’ve been working on a mine in Idaho since 2004. We still have about two years to go on the economic analysis part and then it will be three or four years to build it. The cost to build it is anywhere from $1 billion to $3 billion.

To read the rest of this article, which appeared in the June 2022 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

Optimizing Test Engineering Practices for High-Mix Electronics Manufacturing

08/15/2022 | Mark Laing, Siemens Digital Industries Software
For PCB and assembly manufacturers, test engineering has become a critical factor in enhancing the profitability of new product introductions (NPIs). Given the trend toward high-mix, low-volume production, the journey from design data to an automated PCB testing program must be quicker and more efficient than ever before. In this article, we will discuss how to optimize the efficiency of the test engineering process in accordance with these new market realities.

How Will Emerging Chiplet Technology Affect PCBs?

06/01/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
In a recent conversation with Ventec’s Alun Morgan, the I-Connect007 Editorial Team discussed, among several topics, semiconductor packaging developments. Industry insiders will know that, when you get Happy Holden and Alun Morgan talking about emerging technology trends, there will be insights shared.

SMTA Europe Solder Finish Webinar Addresses Defects Causes and Cures

12/14/2020 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
“What is your most common PCB problem?” A survey conducted by Bob Willis had revealed finish solderability to be the predominant contender, and it was clear that the choice of solderable finish applied to surface mount boards could have a significant effect on the assembly yield and cost of the final circuit. SMTA Europe organised an informative and enlightening webinar this month entitled “Guide to PCB Solder Finishes—Process Defects Causes and Cures,” with soldering specialist Bob Willis as presenter.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.