How Smart Is Your Factory?

This month’s topic is smart factories, and this means it is not just because machines share data but because a company designed their smart factory and how the data usage was planned to enable them to do something unique like producing a single-panel lot size in a hands-off manufacturing environment. That sounds like a mouthful, and it is, but the gist is that when you plan a production facility with the mindset that connectivity and optimization will be key aspects of your operation, it will pay dividends in the form of lower production cost, better traceability, and higher reliability.

Okay, so that wasn’t any less of a mouthful, but it did help elaborate the point. When I look at a smart factory in the view of producing a quality product, I look at all the education and due diligence required. This is what I am looking for to determine if a facility is a smart factory or not.

cleanguy_Camden-0319.jpgStarting with the receiving dock all the way to final packaging, every process step is an opportunity to contaminate the final product. Conveying this information to everyone in production starts at the top of the quality department and should be part of an overall focus on reliability. Too many times I do process audits at contract manufacturers, and there are a lot of “box checkers” that are doing the bare minimum regarding cleanliness. Many times, that is exactly what is spelled out on the print, and in the end, you get what you ask for—nothing. That means they are building product that is shippable and not much more than that. That isn’t smart; it’s quite the opposite. I’ve said it a million times, and I’ll say it at least one more time that the cost of failure is always higher than doing it right the first time.

Having driven my point thoroughly into the ground, let’s look at the assembly process steps and what to be on the lookout for. This isn’t a fully comprehensive list, but it’s certainly enough to help clean up a lot of what is going on out there. Trust me, I’ve seen a few good processes, but I’ve also seen a lot of terrible processes—a lot.

Incoming receiving and storage may seem like a fairly sterile area since there aren’t any chemicals being used or boards being handled or parts that aren’t in some type of packaging. The issues with this process are how and where parts are stored. Many times, I see warehouse racks that are in the same room as the receiving dock that is fully open to the outside elements. This can create spikes in excessive humidity that can impact parts that aren’t marked for moisture-sensitive packaging.

For example, if it’s a dock in a normally dry climate such as Mexico and it rains for some reason, the air can become saturated with dust and contaminants from the typically extremely dry ground. If a breeze carrying some of the dust and contaminants settles on top of the stored raw goods, this can cause issues with solderability or other reliability-related problems. If partially used packs of bare boards or components are stored in this environment, the risk increases. That is why it’s important to have the smarts to separate the receiving dock and storage areas.

Moving on to the paste print process, the main thing to be smart about is controlling the humidity in the printer to help reduce solder balls and similar defect types. Beyond that, keeping track of the print life of the paste and the screen clean are the main opportunities for introducing some sort of failure.

The reflow process is the first opportunity to do some real damage by not being smart. The top things to think about are oven maintenance and proper thermal profiling of assemblies. Oven maintenance is something that I see scheduled anywhere from weekly to annually with the level being varied. It is essential to keep the chains oiled and the fans exhausting, but it’s also important to keep the interior free of excessive residues that collect and redeposit back on the PCBA surface. I normally see interior cleaning no more than twice a year, and depending on the number of pieces ran through, that may be woefully inadequate.

The paste flux residues are normally very concentrated forms of flux activators, and any of this material will be detrimental to reliability—no question about it. Properly profiling the assemblies is equally important because if the areas with the highest thermal mass aren’t monitored, the required temperatures for rendering no-clean flux near benign may not be reached and the activators will remain active. If no-clean flux residues aren’t properly processed, they can be as detrimental as leaving a water-soluble flux behind after wash. Not smart.

The PTH wave solder process is among the worst offenders of all as there are many ways it can go wrong. It truly takes a smart operator to know how to properly run a wave solder process. The main issues are excessive flux penetrating either the top side of the board or under selective pallet keep-out areas. If the pallets aren’t properly cleaned, flux residues can build up in the corners, and any part of the board that comes into contact with that is at a greatly increased risk of field failure (if it even makes it that far).

If the hold-down springs don’t have equal pressure at all points, there is also a risk that the board will raise up on the side that has less pressure. This allows spray flux to be deposited on areas of the assembly that were never intended to see flux. Any part of the board under the pallet will be shielded from the full thermal energy and remain active. What I am trying to convey is that it’s not smart to leave any active flux residues on an assembly; you don’t have to be smart to know that.

Next up are any hand solder operations that take place post-SMT or wave. This is where the smartest of operators are needed because there is nothing more dangerous to the reliability of a product than a human with unfettered access to flux. If a part is difficult to solder, the answer is clearly more flux, right? While that may be technically correct, it’s among the dumbest things in the history of electronics assembly.

There are a couple of good ways to use flux for hand operations, and they are to use the flux that is part of the cored wire or tacky flux used mostly for BGA rework. When using a cored wire with the proper feed rate, any flux residues will be near benign. The reason for recommending tacky flux is the application is very controlled, and the risk of flux spreading to neighboring components is much lower than using a bottle of liquid flux. Flux spread to surrounding components is a killer to reliability because it will be as active as flux gets next to right out of the bottle.

After some hand operations, there is a desire to clean any residues, which is another questionable operation. If it’s no-clean flux and coating or RF issues are of no concern, just leave it in place. That’s smart. If cleaning is required, it’s very important to be mindful of where any effluent is being deposited. It’s essential to effectively rinse the area that was just washed with IPA or some sort of solvent. Just be smart and see where all the effluent is draining. If that is under other components, they are now at an increased risk for electrical leakage. It’s vital to use the right amount of flux and know where 100% of that is spreading, and if cleaning is part of the process, be sure it’s effective and rinsed properly.

The final part of the assembly process that needs to be considered, at least for this month, is packaging. The points to consider are proper handling and using clean ESD bags/trays for shipping. I have seen many facilities reuse ESD bags that can collect processing residues and general debris over time. They can also lose their ESD properties due to damage. The same goes for trays used anywhere in the process including moving station to station or packaging to be sent to the next supplier.

Throughout all of the process steps I have mentioned, one more thing to think about is proper handling. Wearing gloves is essential, but knowing how to wear gloves is as important as anything else. Gloves should be changed any time an operator wipes their face, touches raw flux, or rubs a saltlick for some reason. Contamination is easily transferred to the PCBA surface and will greatly increase the risk of electrical leakage or electrochemical migration-related issues in the field. It’s smart to know how easily any assembly process can affect reliability.

Eric Camden is a lead investigator at Foresite Inc.



How Smart Is Your Factory?


When you plan a production facility with the mindset that connectivity and optimization will be key aspects of your operation, it will pay dividends in the form of lower production cost, better traceability, and higher reliability.

View Story

The Cost of Quality and the Higher Cost of Failure


If you are shopping a new product around to multiple contract manufacturers (CMs), and if all other things in two separate CMs are equal including price and delivery times but one offers a more comprehensive ongoing quality monitoring system, why wouldn't you go with that one? You usually pay some type of premium for the CM that has an overall quality monitoring system that goes beyond just ICT or bench level testing. Definitely, most CMs will give you some sort of assurance that the product is working as it leaves the facility, but if one has a mindset that more than basic testing is required to show reliability, you will more than likely have fewer field failures.

View Story

The Effect of Thermal Profiles on Cleanliness and Electrical Performance


The process of thermal profiling is one of the most important considerations when setting assembly parameters in reflow soldering. Knowing how to effectively profile includes choosing the proper equipment, understanding the results and being able to adjust as necessary.

View Story

How to Achieve the Apex of Reliability


Knowing the effect of residual ionic content is among the most important data points when looking at reliability because it is directly related to electrical leakage and electrochemical migration-related issues in a normal field service environment. This column discusses the test methods mostly related to cleanliness and different ways to determine if the process is clean enough for the intended end-use environment.

View Story


Does Medical Device Reliability Worry You Sick?


When you are manufacturing high-reliability assemblies related to medical industry, it is critical to take a very close look at the assembly process and all other processes that can influence the end-use reliability—even seemingly unrelated processes, such as post-installation cleaning—as it really could be a matter of life or death.

View Story

Are You Connected to Reliability?


The need for communication between every operator on the manufacturing floor can be a critical difference between a reliable piece of hardware and one that presents some level of unexpected performance. This column highlights a few things happening in the shop floor, such as as touch-up soldering and third shift issue, not commonly communicated, which can cause performance issues.

View Story

Are Megatrends Putting Your Product at Megarisk?


It took 38 years for radio to get 50 million users, television made it in 13 years, Internet in four, iPod in three, and Facebook in only two years. What these numbers mean to our industry is the need to create electronics at blazing speeds that we haven’t seen before. But how will it affect reliability? Read on.

View Story

Cleaning a No-clean Flux: The Worst Decision You’ve Ever Made?


There are a few reasons to choose to clean a no-clean flux, such as when the PCB assembly requires conformal coating, or when probes are required for testing. Other than that, there seems to be no need to clean a no-clean flux. This column tells you more.

View Story

Contamination: The Enemy of Electronics


Welcome to the first installation of “Quest for Reliability.” The goal behind this column is to use my experience at an independent laboratory for over 18 years to help readers understand PCBA reliability issues, and more importantly, prevent suspect conditions in the first place. The laboratory I work in has served every sector of the electronics industry, from oil and gas equipment designed to function miles below the surface of the earth, to aerospace companies and everywhere in between.

View Story
Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.